Comparisons

Rivarise compared with every major AI visibility tool

Sourced, dated comparisons against the tools you are probably also evaluating. Every competitor figure links to their own pricing page, and every page says plainly where the other product is the better choice.

Competitor pricing verified 2026-08-08. We sell one of these products, so verify the figures yourself.

What is the best AI visibility tracking tool? There is no single answer, because the tools in this category optimize for different things. Enterprise buyers who need SOC 2 and agent analytics are served by Profound. Teams needing country-level segmentation are served by Peec AI. Teams buying crawler analytics and hallucination detection are served by Scrunch. Rivarise is built for the buyer who wants the widest engine coverage for the budget, with all nine engines included rather than sold as add-ons, a permanent free plan, and the full answer text stored behind every metric.

The comparisons

Each page covers pricing at every tier, engine coverage, prompt limits, what the other tool does better, and who should choose which.

How this category prices, in one table

Entry pricing and what it includes, from each vendor's public page on 2026-08-08. Engine counts are the deciding number more often than headline price.

ToolEntry paid priceEngines at entryPrompts at entryFree plan
Rivarise$69/mo450 per dayYes, permanent
Profound$99/mo billed yearlyChatGPT only50 promptsNo public free plan
Peec AINot publishedChatGPT, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Copilot, Perplexity, GeminiDaily trackingNo permanent free plan listed
Otterly.AI$29/mo4 core search engines15 promptsNo permanent free plan
Mentions.so$49/mo3 LLMs25 promptsNo permanent free plan listed
Scrunch AI$300/mo, $250 billed annually4 platforms125 promptsNo public free plan

Several vendors sell engines as add-ons on top of the base price. Compare the total for the engines you actually need, not the entry price.

What to check before you buy any of them

  • Which engines are included, and which are add-ons. This is the single largest source of surprise cost in the category. A $189 plan with three add-ons is not a $189 plan.
  • Whether the Google surfaces are separated. Gemini, Google AI Mode and Google AI Overviews answer differently and reach different audiences. Averaging them hides the difference that matters.
  • Whether you can read the answer text. If a tool shows you a score without the wording behind it, you cannot tell a real drop from a scoring change.
  • How prompts are counted. Per day, per month, per project or per domain: the same headline number can mean very different things.
  • What happens to history when you downgrade. Retention windows differ widely and are rarely on the pricing page.
  • Whether you can evaluate without sales. Two weeks of daily data is the minimum needed to judge any of these tools honestly.

Common questions

Rivarise includes all 9 engines without add-on pricing from the $349 Business plan upward, and the same 9 across 5 client brands on the $1,299 Agency plan. Several competitors include three or four engines at their entry tier and sell the rest as add-ons or gate them behind an Enterprise contract, so compare the total for the engines you need rather than the headline price.
Rivarise has a permanent free plan: 3 prompts per week against ChatGPT on one domain, with 7 days of history, no card and no expiry. Among the tools compared here, most offer a trial at best and several require a sales conversation to see the product at all.
Public self-serve plans in this category ran from roughly $29 to $500 per month in 2026, with enterprise contracts quoted into the thousands. The right number depends almost entirely on how many engines you need and how many prompts and domains you are tracking. Work out the engines you need first, then compare the total price for that coverage.
No, and be sceptical of any that imply it. Citation decisions belong to the engines, which use models, retrieval sources and policies that change without notice. What these tools do is measure what the engines actually returned and show you where the gaps are. The outcome is earned through content and authority work, not purchased through a subscription.
Yes, and some teams do during an evaluation, because historical data does not transfer between vendors. None of these tools install code on your site, so running two in parallel for a few weeks costs nothing but the subscriptions and is the most reliable way to compare them on your own prompts.

The fastest way to compare is your own data

Add your domain and five prompts free, and judge Rivarise on your category rather than on our table.

Start tracking free

Free plan, no card required. Nothing to install.